Features / Deciding and delivering

Judge the sites, record the choice and deliver the report

Bring every saved location together, score each against the criteria you already use, test whether the ranking survives other assumptions, keep a record of what was chosen and why, and hand the client a report or a link.

Projects

Every saved location, together and side by side

Save areas into a project and open its report. The header gives you the combined picture, here 363,404 people across three Dallas locations covering 197.8 km², with a median income of $91,735 and 1.89 times as many people present by day as by night. Because two of these areas overlap, the page says so at the top and counts the 7,771 shared people once. Each figure carries its index against the metro, so the renter share at 145 and the day and night ratio at 166 are readable at a glance. Free includes one project with four saved areas, and Pro and Team have no limit on either.

The analysis page header for a Dallas project, showing 363,404 people combined, 197.8 square kilometers, median income $91,735, day to night ratio 1.89, and index chips against the metro
The top of the Dallas project report. The overlap notice, the combined figures and their index scores against the metro.

Site criteria screener

Score every site against the client's sheet

Enter the thresholds a tenant rep carries, such as population within three miles above 50,000, median household income above $75,000, at most two competitors within two miles and an anchor grocer within 400 meters, and every saved site is judged on each line, with the figure beside the result. Close means within the margin of error. Start from a template for coffee, quick service, salons, fitness, childcare, urgent care or pet, each stating where its thresholds came from, and edit it to the concept. The grid runs over an uploaded list of a thousand candidates and prints on the report with the criteria stated. Included on Pro and Team.

The Criteria tab for a Dallas project with the Coffee, drive-through template attached, a grid of three sites against five lines with the measured figure in each cell, and the criteria and their sources written beneath
The Criteria tab for the Dallas project with the Coffee, drive-through starter template attached. Each cell shows the measured figure beside its result, and every site passes four of the five lines, missing only the competitor count.

Site comparison stress test

Does the ranking hold when the assumptions move?

Two candidate sites can swap places between a one-mile ring and a five-mile ring, or between a radius and a ten-minute drive, because one sits on an arterial grid and the other in a college town. The stress test ranks every site under each scenario you choose, with the client's thresholds as written, tightened and loosened, and then explains the result in sentences, where the ranking flips, which measure moved it, what the ground between two rings adds to each site, and which site meets every line most often. It is a statement about stability under assumptions, never about the odds of success. Included on Pro and Team.

The Stress test card for a Dallas project, with chips for the saved shape, one, three and five mile rings and a ten-minute drive, the findings written as sentences, and a matrix of each site's rank under each scenario
The stress test for the three Dallas sites under five geographies. Deep Ellum leads at one and three miles, Legacy West at five miles and on the ten-minute drive, and every flip is named with the figures that moved it.

Decision history

Keep a record of what was chosen and why

Record on a project which site was chosen, or that none was, along with the client, the concept and the reason. The record freezes what was on the table at the time, namely the candidates, how many lines of the criteria sheet each one passed, the sheet as it was worded and the findings of the stress test, so it still reads correctly long after the project has moved on. Add what happened later, such as a lease signed, an opening, a loss in negotiation or a withdrawal. A decision and an outcome are kept apart, because a strong site can still lose a negotiation, and neither is treated as a verdict on the analysis. The whole history is searchable by client, concept, reason, site and project, and exports as CSV. Included on Pro and Team.

The Decision card for a Dallas project recording that Legacy West was chosen for a coffee client, with the reason, the candidates and how many lines each passed, the stress test's sentences, and buttons to add an outcome
A decision recorded on the Dallas project. Legacy West was chosen for a drive-through coffee concept, and the record freezes the three candidates, how many lines each passed, the sheet's version and the stress test's findings as they stood that day.

The assistant

Ask the assistant, and let it act when you confirm

Ask the assistant to find a place, draw an area or compare saved sites, and it uses the same analysis tools as the map and explains the results in plain language. When the answer calls for something saved, it proposes a location or a project and shows you the proposal, and nothing is created until you confirm it. Ask it to draft the report narrative and it writes from the figures it retrieved and nothing else, with every number checked against them before you see the draft. Free includes 10 questions a month. Pro includes 300, and Team includes 300 per seat with an additional deep analysis mode.

  • Looks up places from a city, county, landmark, business or street address
  • Draws and analyzes areas as a radius or a drive, walk, bike or transit time
  • Proposes a saved location or project that is created only when you confirm
  • Drafts the narrative from the figures it retrieved, for you to accept before it prints

Report narrative

Open the report with prose written from its own figures

Press Generate from data and a draft of a few paragraphs is written from the project's own figures, the same summary the tabs show plus the trend, the places roll-up, the screener grid and the stress test's sentences, under instructions that forbid any number not in that input. Before you see it, every number in the draft is matched against the figures within the rounding written, and a sentence with an unmatched number is removed and counted. Nothing prints until you have read the draft, edited it and saved it, and the report says who did and which data release it was written against. Included on Pro and Team.

The Narrative card at the top of a Dallas project's overview with its Generate from data button, above the At a glance tiles it would be written from
The Narrative card at the top of the Dallas project's overview, with the Generate from data button, above the At a glance figures a draft is written from.

The PDF report

Print the whole analysis with your name on it

Download the project as a PDF that mirrors the analysis tabs part by part, from the map and the combined figures through people, income and housing, work and movement, businesses, competition and the comparison, with the criteria grid, the stress test and the decision where they exist. Your logo and contact block sit on the cover and every page names its sources and the data release. The report for the Dallas sample project runs to 32 pages. Included on Pro and Team.

The cover page of a generated PDF report titled Sample project, three sites in Dallas, with the data sources listed at the foot
The cover of the PDF report for the Dallas sample project, prepared 25 September 2026, with every data source named at the foot of the page.

Shareable reports

Send a report to a client who has no account

Create a read-only link to a project report carrying your logo and contact details, and send it to anyone. Choose whether it lasts a week, a month, a quarter or a year, add a passcode that you pass on separately, and label the link so you know later who received it. The shared copy refreshes when you save a location, it leaves out the criteria sheet, which stays your own working tool, and you can revoke it at any time. Included on Pro and Team.

The Share dialog over a Dallas project's overview, with an expiry of 30 days, a passcode field, a label reading Northline Coffee, site review, and a Create link button
The Share dialog for the Dallas project. The link is set to expire in 30 days, carries a passcode to pass on separately, and is labeled so you know later who received it.

Keep reading

The features beside these

Every feature is listed by plan on the features page, and how each figure is built is on the methodology page.

Competition

Competitors and supply, a market share estimate by travel time, cannibalization across your sites, co-tenancy profiles and chain footprints.

Define an area

Draw a radius, a polygon or a travel time, analyze rings and named boundaries, or upload the sites you already have.